ΣΥΝΕΝΤΕΥΞΗ Η. ΖΑΦΕΙΡΟΠΟΥΛΟΥ ΓΡΑΜΜΑΤΕΑ ΚΕ ΟΑΚΚΕ ΣΤΗΝ EΡΤ ΣΤΙΣ 31 ΜΑΗ ΓΙΑ ΤΙΣ ΕΥΡΩΕΚΛΟΓΕΣ 2024
ΔΙΑΚΑΝΑΛΙΚΗ ΣΥΝΕΝΤΕΥΞΗ ΟΑΚΚΕ ΣΤΙΣ 26 ΜΑΗ ΓΙΑ ΤΙΣ ΕΥΡΩΕΚΛΟΓΕΣ 2024
ΝΕΑ ΑΝΑΤΟΛΗ
Νέα Ανατολή αρ.φ.559 (εδώ μπορείτε να βρείτε τα φύλλα από φ.486-Μάρτης 2013-και νεώτερα)
Που μπορείτε να βρείτε την έντυπη έκδοση της Νέας Ανατολής
The Russian social-imperialism subjugates Asia and infiltrates in the West
The content of a successful provocation is generally of the following type: the instigator strikes the victim such a heavy blow that disorientates him,
that is makes him turn against a third part instead of against the provocateur himself. The provocation is estimated as excellent when the third part happens to be the provocateur?s great enemy. The provocation is evaluated as masterly when the instigator manages to present himself before both victims? eyes, that is before his enemies? eyes, as their best friend or even a secondary enemy.
The above advanced type of provocation demands a professional provocateur and a couple of unaware of the common enemy?s nature and full of internal problems victims.
Today, all these preconditions exist and are compressed into the Afghan war that has just broken out.
The professional provocateur, which is the Russian social-imperialism, is benefit from the conflict both victims, the U.S. and Afghanistan, have plunged themselves into, and feverishly attempts to reap the fruits of his labor.
Russia?s strategic enemies, her rival imperialism and an extreme, typical Third World opponent, have plunged themselves into virulent war. At the same time, appears, before both fatal enemies? eyes, to be either a great friend (before American eyes) or an intermediary force or even a secondary enemy (before the Taliban?s eyes).
This is not an achievement confined in the Afghanistan or Pakistan region. It is also a strategic goal concerning the formation of a more and more competitive intercourse between the U.S. and Third World, in favor of the Russo-Chinese axis. The axis is now capable of presenting itself as a pro-U.S., pro-European, and a less hostile towards the Third World imperialistic force.
THE PRIME SUSPECT AND THE STRAGETIC CONSEQUENCES OF MANHATTAN LARGE MASSACRE
Here, the perpetrator, after having given a colossal war-like strike, wants in whatsoever way to conceal,
or more accurately to obscure the political source of that strike. In such a case, it is not the police investigation or the technical examination, but mainly the political analysis that can first reveal the source of the strike. The police investigation and the
technical analysis could, at most, point at the physical perpetrator but could hardly lead to the instigator, that is the political source of the
strike. In those cases, the political analysis surely directs the police and technical examination and not vice versa.
The first question that the political analysis must raise is the following: who benefits politically from such a large-scale strike? The answer to this question is given, mostly, by examining its consequences...
AFGHANISTAN: RUSSIA REAPS THE FRUITS OF MANHATTAN
One cannot trace the perpetrator of the Manhattan towers strike, unless he tracks down whoever benefits by the result of this strike.
The specific result is the war in Afghanistan. Three factors basically participate in it: directly the U.S. and the Taliban, and indirectly Russia via Northern Alliance. Russia took control of Northern Alliance two days before the strike in Manhattan. Then Massoud, its independent leader, was murdered and replaced by Fahim, the formerly head of the Russian occupation forces security police...(poster that we put up in many places in Athens and Piraeus)
PUTIN’S VISIT IN GREECE: THE SPIDER’S KISS
This is the text of a poster issued by our organization in order to reveal the political character of Putin’s visit to Greece and call Greek people to attend our political rally held in Athens at the Hotel Titania on December 7, 2001, one day after the arrival of Putin. The following text has been formed with necessary supplementary notes for those that are not well aaquainted with Greek political situation.